How practices use Evaaluate

Scenario

Illustrative persona: a 3-partner CA firm specializing in tax advisory and share allotment valuations for SMEs and startups raising angel and Series A rounds.

Challenge

Each Rule 11UA report takes roughly 15 days of practitioner time: manual data gathering from client documents and MCA filings, spreadsheet-based DCF construction, and iterative report drafting. Growing deal flow means turning away work.

How Evaaluate helps

Evaaluate ingests the audited financials (Excel or text-based PDF), seeds WACC and growth assumptions from sourced market inputs, runs deterministic DCF and NAV, and assembles a certification-ready DOCX. Partners spend their time at the three review gates — where their judgment matters — instead of on data assembly.

What the workflow delivers

• Active practitioner time per report drops from days to hours
• The mechanical steps (extraction, computation, drafting) run automatically
• Every assumption, revision, and approval is captured in the audit trail
• Per-report pricing (₹999 for Rule 11UA) keeps engagement economics predictable

Scenario

Illustrative persona: a professional services firm with valuation teams in several cities, serving NCLT proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

Challenge

Different teams use different Excel models, apply varying approaches to WACC construction, and produce inconsistently formatted reports. Quality variance across offices undermines credibility in NCLT proceedings.

How Evaaluate helps

A single deterministic computation engine, one WACC build-up methodology with disclosed sources, and uniform report output for every office. The engagement dashboard gives practice leaders visibility into every engagement's gate status.

What the workflow delivers

• One methodology and report format across every office
• WACC components sourced and cited identically on every engagement
• Gate approvals create a consistent, reviewable quality bar
• New team members work inside a guided pipeline instead of inherited spreadsheets

Scenario

Illustrative persona: a registered valuer team engaged for a manufacturing company undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, with a court-imposed submission deadline.

Challenge

The engagement requires parallel DCF, NAV, and comparable-company analysis, plus an asset-class-level liquidation value breakdown — weeks of manual modeling under a deadline measured in days.

How Evaaluate helps

Evaaluate computes DCF, NAV, and comparables from the same locked assumption set in one run, and derives liquidation value from a per-asset-class breakdown for IBC dual-valuation engagements. The team focuses on assumption review and the value conclusion.

What the workflow delivers

• All three methods computed consistently from one locked input set
• Liquidation value derived from an explicit asset-class breakdown
• Computation runs are SHA-256 hashed for reproducibility under scrutiny
• Practitioner time concentrates on judgment, not spreadsheet mechanics

Scenario

Illustrative persona: an individual IBBI Registered Valuer practicing independently, focused on Rule 11UA valuations for private companies and startups.

Challenge

A solo practitioner juggling many concurrent engagements handles client communication, data gathering, modeling, drafting, and compliance documentation alone. Context-switching stretches turnaround times and caps revenue.

How Evaaluate helps

The engagement dashboard tracks every valuation's stage; ingestion, computation, and report assembly are automated; and the pre-delivery QA checklist catches mechanical errors before dispatch — the leverage of a support team without hiring one.

What the workflow delivers

• More concurrent engagements per practitioner
• Same-day turnaround becomes feasible for standard engagements
• The QA gate catches weight-sum, WACC/TGR, and statute-method errors automatically
• Pay-per-report pricing means no fixed software cost while the practice grows